Business

Pakistan to exceed revenue target in FY22: Shaukat Tarin

Published

on

  • Tarin says revenue will hit Rs6.1tr, compared to a target of Rs5.8tr.
  • He is confident of defending PM’s subsidy package during IMF review.
  • “IMF shouldn’t have any objections on this,” finance minister says.

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan will exceed the revenue target set in the annual budget for the current financial year, Finance Minister Shaukat Tarin said on Wednesday.

Tarin said revenue would hit Rs6.1 trillion ($34.2 billion), compared to a target of Rs5.8 trillion.

“Despite that, I gave the target of 5.8 trillion, I’m going to hit at 6.1 trillion, and I’m tracking,” he told a news conference in Islamabad.

He said a recent fuel and electricity subsidy package announced by Prime Minister Imran Khan would be partially financed by the extra revenue, which may cause the fiscal deficit to slightly rise or fall.

“If due to that the deficit may go a bit 0.5% up or down, that may be,” he said.

Read more: Shaukat Tarin opposes PM Imran Khan’s public outburst against EU envoys

Embattled PM Imran Khan, facing a no-confidence move to oust him from office by opposition parties, announced a cut in petrol and electricity prices on Monday despite a steep rise in the global oil market, pledging to freeze the new rates until the next budget in June.

The subsidy will cost around $1.5 billion, a big number for Pakistan to defend during the International Monetary Fund (IMF) 7th review, which already has started, of a $6 billion rescue package agreed in 2019.

The south Asian country had to undertake fiscal tightening measures to pass its last IMF review, which was delayed by months as the government struggled to complete prior action required by the lender to release $1 billion in February.

The finance ministry has said that Pakistan was confident it will be able to defend its subsidy package during the IMF review, which Tarin also reiterated.

“We are doing it with our own revenues, which has improved. We have a space for that,” he said. “So, IMF shouldn’t have any objections on this.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version