In an interview, Punjab President of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, Rana Sanaullah, stated, “The people love resistance, we did resistance for entire life but this time it goes to the opposite.”

He claimed to have spent the previous thirty-two years working with Nawaz Sharif. His work involved resistance politics. It must be acknowledged that the PTI’s founder engaged in resistance.

The leader of the PML-N stated, “We assumed that the founder of the PTI could not resist, but he did so.” “We need to determine whether the PTI’s opposition has hurt us or our agreement,” he stated. “It appears that there is a barrier separating our compromise from their resistance,” he continued.

Rana Sana declared, “I had opposed formation of coalition government in the party meeting.” “There are a lot of reasons I could give to justify my defeat, but I gave in.”

“Javed Latif’s remarks regarding elections are incorrect. He remarked, “I am certain that Javed Latif was also defeated and I am believing as much about defeat as that.” Rana Sana remarked, “Javed Latif has resentment because he lost the election and Rana Tanvir won it.” “I understand his anguish, which could only be eased by Rana Tanvir’s de-notification.”

“It is an odd request to allow voting in Mian Sahib’s district,” he remarked. The PML-N leader declared, “No choice was made in the election, no one was targeted, these are all conspiracy theories.”

Rana Sana claimed, “I had a heated exchange with Qamar Javed Bajwa over being booked in the heroin case during a parliament function.” “I told him that God would give justice to the case you booked me for.” I informed him you did it, but he denied having done so. Sanaullah stated, “Qamar Javed Bajwa made it happen, but it was the PTI’s founder’s idea.”

“There were political repercussions because we were unable to refute the false impression that the PML-N is not associated with the caretaker government,” he stated.

He remarked, “There were some other reasons too; Mohsin Naqvi was not given the ministry only for PML-N.” “Some amendments should be introduced to prevent a caretaker set-up member from joining the elected government.” Now, each caretaker administration will act to maintain its political influence, he declared.

The former interior minister stated, “It is a misconception that someone asked them to stage a sit-in. The Faizabad sit-in was the Tehreek-e-Labbaik’s decision.” Before they left Lahore, I spoke with them in my capacity as Punjab’s law minister, the PML-N leader stated. “They called for Zahid Hamid to step down. Raja Zafarul Haq will investigate the situation before a decision is made, as we stated. “They asked to be allowed to leave, promising to remain peaceful when the inquiry report could not be finished in four days.”

The head of the PML-N said, “Federal government and the agencies decided not to stop the protest, which was feared to result in loss of life.”

“The government launched a crackdown that resulted in failure and the talks in Islamabad were a failure,” the PML-N leader stated. The protest was then put to an end by the resignations of Faiz Hameed and Qamar Bajwa.

“The idea that someone started the TLP is false,” the former interior minister declared.

The PTI’s founder has the power to either destroy the nation or commit self-destruction. The PML-N leader stated, “It remains to be seen what he will do initially.

He said that political destabilisation is the fault of politicians and political parties, and that they had to own up to it. He continued, “At this point, the country’s political stability has only been hampered by the PTI’s founder.”